MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7163514391 · doi:10.21199/wb45.2.7

FEATURED PHOTO: THE MANGROVE YELLOW WARBLER REACHES CALIFORNIA

2014· article· W7163514391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oscar Johnson, MARK J. BILLINGS

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Birds · 2014
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMangroveWarblerSubspeciesMainlandPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Yellow Warbler (Setophaga petechia) comprises three groups of subspecies distributed across the Americas, from Alaska and northern Canada south through the West Indies and the mainland of Middle America to the northern coast of South America and the Galapagos Islands. The groups differ primarily in the head pattern of adult males (Lowther et al. 1999). The Northern Yellow Warbler (S. p. aestiva group) comprises the predominantly migratory subspecies with a green and/or yellow crown that breed across much of the United States, Canada, and northern and central Mexico; the Golden Yellow Warbler (S. p. petechia group) comprises the largely resident subspecies, most with a chestnut crown, found in south Florida, the Caribbean, and the coast of northeastern South America; and the Mangrove Yellow Warbler (S. p. erithachorides group) comprises the largely resident subspecies, most with a fully chestnut head, found in coastal mangroves from extreme southern Texas and central Baja California south as far as the coast of northwestern South America, with an isolated population on the Galapagos Islands that resembles the Golden Yellow Warbler in the extent of red on the head (Lowther et al. 1999). Although currently considered one species (AOU 1998), each of the three subspecies groups has been considered a full species by some authors (Hellmayr 1935).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern BirdsSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207