MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7163585579 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/q536z

A look through the kaleidoscope of culture: How Canadian second-generation immigrants’ identities shape their sexual attitudes

2025· other· W7163585579 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pari‐Gole Noorishad, Krystelle Shaughnessy

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityMulticulturalismDignityOpenness to experienceImmigrationFeelingCultural diversitySexual identityAcculturation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

People’s sexual attitudes vary based on their culture. Sexual attitudes include peoples’ thoughts and feelings on sexuality broadly and on their sexual behaviours specifically. Cross-cultural researchers often categorize societies into Western and non-Western groups. Western societies typically include countries influenced by European cultural, political, and economic values, such as North America and Europe (World Values Survey, 2020). In these societies, sexual permissiveness and openness to sexual exploration are often endorsed (Aboulhassan & Brumley, 2019; Hall & Graham, 2021). Non-Western societies are not rooted in European values and encompass diverse cultural groups (e.g., Middle East, Latin America, Africa; World Values Survey, 2020). People in these societies tend to endorse binary gender norms and disapproval toward premarital sex (especially for women) and same-sex relationships (Hall & Graham, 2021; Human Dignity Trust, 2023). These norms were often enforced through the spread of Christian values during European colonization (Amnesty International, 2023). The dichotomy between Western and non-Western cultures does not account for the sexual attitudes multicultural people may hold. Multicultural people are likely to encounter sexual attitudes from multiple cultural groups to different extents. For instance, generational status may mould people’s sexual attitudes. Second-generation immigrants (SGIs) are born and live in a country where at least one of their parents was not born (Statistics Canada, 2011). SGIs are a unique generation of multicultural people socialised in at least two cultures from birth: their parent(s)’ origin culture, and their birthplace’s culture (Yampolsky et al., 2015). Navigating sexuality within multiple cultural contexts can be complex, as SGIs may receive cultural messages with conflicting sexual attitudes. On the one hand, the Western culture into which SGIs are born tends to promote openness toward sexual exploration, often referred to as permissiveness. On the other hand, their parents’ non-Western cultures may promote sex only within marriage. Qualitative research suggests that SGIs often blend these messages, endorsing sexual exploration primarily within the context of committed romantic relationships. Valuing emotional connection in sexual relationships is a sexual attitude referred to as sexual communion (Hendrick et al., 2006; under review, Noorishad et al., 2025). However, the available data on these sexual attitudes is largely qualitative, causing a gap in understanding the extent to which SGIs endorse sexual permissiveness and communion. The conflicting cultural messages SGIs navigate when forming their sexual attitudes can raise a more specific set of sexual attitudes: sexual shame and sexual pride. Sexual shame refers to feelings of failure, guilt, or inadequacy related to one’s sexual thoughts, feelings, or behaviours (Rendina et al., 2018; Ussher et al., 2017). Conversely, sexual pride reflects a sense of confidence, self-acceptance, and self-worth in relation to sexuality (Gordon, 2017; Rendina et al., 2018). SGIs who identify more with non-Western cultures may endorse negative messages on sexual exploration, which can contribute to sexual shame (Ussher et al., 2017). Conversely, SGIs who identify more with Western cultures may explore their sexualities without constraints and experience more sexual pride (Rendina et al., 2018). Taken together, these sexual attitudes provide a deeper understanding of how SGIs experience their sexuality in multicultural contexts. The processes through which SGIs integrate, negotiate, or reject cultural norms may shed more light on their sexual attitudes than their generational status alone. Acculturation, cultural identity, and language spoken at home have been tied to sexual attitude formation (Coleman-Minahan et al., 2020; Doucerain et al., 2017; la Roi & Mood, 2023). Most researchers who examine how cultural processes explain attitudes do so through a framework called acculturation (Doucerain et al., 2017). In acculturation theories, immigrants go through a decision-making process of integrating or rejecting cultural components from each of their cultures into their identities (Sam & Berry, 2010; Yampolsky et al., 2013). Acculturation may not apply well to SGIs, given that they are born into more than one culture. Acculturation tends to focus on objective membership to a cultural group (i.e., behaviours that are deemed as fitting into a culture such as speaking the language of the origin culture; Ryder et al., 2000). However, cultural identity is about people’s subjective levels of identification with their culture; it can illuminate how people integrate multiple identities into the self (Yampolsky et al., 2016). For example, if a person identifies strongly with their origin culture’s sexual attitudes, they may hold more non-Western sexual attitudes such as greater communion (la Roi & Mood, 2023). Taken together, SGIs’ cultural identities offer a lens into how they navigate sexual attitudes such as permissiveness, communion, sexual shame, and sexual pride. Acculturation and cultural identity do not fully account for how multiple overlapping identities and social contexts shape SGIs’ sexual attitudes. SGIs have reported that their sexual attitudes are influenced by their sociodemographic identities, such as religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. Intersectionality offers a framework for understanding how social identities—such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, and socioeconomic status—interact to shape lived experiences and exposure to oppression (Crenshaw, 1989, 1991). It is a dynamic process shaped by and shaping systems of power, including racism, sexism, and heterosexism (Bowleg et al., 2024; Collins, 2019, 2020). For example, a heterosexual and a gay SGI man may share similar cultural backgrounds and generational status, yet experience sexuality differently due to sexual orientation (Nakamura et al., 2013). Dhoest (2016) found that gay SGI men often faced homophobia within their origin cultures and racism in their birthplace cultures. Other intersecting factors, such as having at least one parent born in a Western country of birth, have been linked to more permissive sexual attitudes (Kalmijn & Kraaykamp, 2018). It is also likely that having a partner from the birthplace country or of Western background may impact sexual attitudes in similar ways. The intertwined nature of identity underscores the importance of an intersectional approach in understanding the sexual attitudes of SGIs. The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) examine the extent to which cultural factors (i.e., acculturation, cultural identity, and language spoken at home) and intersecting identity variables (e.g., sexual orientation, age, gender) explain variance in sexual attitudes among Canadian SGIs, including both general attitudes (permissiveness and communion) and specific sexual attitudes (sexual shame and sexual pride), and (2) compare whether cultural factors or intersecting identity variables more strongly predict general versus specific sexual attitudes. To address our two objectives, we conducted an online survey with emerging Canadian adult SGIs, using two separate samples: one from a student population and one from the general community. This survey will answer the following research questions: • RQ1: To what extent do acculturation, cultural identity, and language spoken at home predict sexual attitudes (permissiveness, communion, sexual shame, and sexual pride, respectively) among SGIs? • RQ2: To what extent do acculturation, cultural identity, and language spoken at home predict sexual attitudes (permissiveness, communion, sexual shame, and sexual pride, respectively) among SGIs, after accounting for the effects of age, gender, and sexual orientation?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.010
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0160.005
Open science0.0250.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207