MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pemberdayaan UMKM Melalui Fasilitas Legalitas Usaha di Desa Bajing, Kroya: Implementasi Program Pendampingan NIB, P-IRT, dan Sertifikat Halal

2025· article· W7163648192 on OpenAlexaff
Said Rendi Saputra, Devina Stevanova Najwa Philo Basori, Nuroaena Nuroaena, Iffa Naila Farkhria, Rizal Miftahul’ulum, Inggit Yulia Wardani, Audivalensi Kautsarmesya, Salsa Apriliana Putri, Kimi Habibie, Amini Dwi Astanti, Desi Ratna Sari, Ormat Ormat, Wahyudin Wahyudin, Desty Lofita Ayunissa

Bibliographic record

VenueLinggamas Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHalal products and consumer behavior
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kebijakan formalisasi Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) melalui platform digital nasional menghadapi paradoks implementasi di tingkat perdesaan, di mana keterbatasan literasi digital menjadi penghalang utama. Tujuan program adalah meningkatkan kesadaran UMKM mengenai pentingnya Nomor Induk Berusaha (NIB), Pangan Industri Rumah Tangga (P-IRT), dan Sertifikasi Halal, serta memberikan pendampingan teknis langsung dalam proses pendaftarannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah penyuluhan partisipatif yang dikombinasikan dengan pendampingan teknis intensif. Hasilnya, program ini berhasil memfasilitasi penerbitan NIB bagi 11 UMKM peserta dengan tingkat keberhasilan 100% dan menginisiasi proses pengurusan P-IRT serta Sertifikasi Halal. Keberhasilan ini menunjukkan bahwa model intervensi high-touch yang menempatkan mahasiswa sebagai "perangkat lunak manusia" (human middleware) merupakan strategi efektif untuk mengakselerasi adopsi kebijakan digital di tingkat akar rumput.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLinggamas Jurnal Pengabdian MasyarakatSame topicHalal products and consumer behaviorFrench-language works237,207