MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7163723796

A Study of Stochastic Differential Equations Driven by Cylindrical Lévy Processes

2025· other· en· W7163723796 on OpenAlexaff
Liqiong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralizationStochastic partial differential equationStochastic differential equationUniquenessBanach spaceFubini's theoremStochastic processWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis develops a rigorous framework for stochastic integration in Banach spaces, with a particular focus on integration with respect to cylindrical Lévy processes – an infinite-dimensional generalization of Lévy processes that contains jumps and discontinuities. Motivated by the need to work in non-Hilbertian spaces, the thesis makes original contributions, including a generalization of the Itô integral for Banach space-valued processes, a stochastic Fubini theorem for generalised cylindrical Lévy processes, existence and uniqueness solution for Lévy driven stochastic differential equations in Banach spaces, as well as a key extension of the Brze´zniak and Hausenblas [8] framework to cylindrical Lévy settings using p-summing operators. These results are important in the theory of stochastic partial differential equations and infinite-dimensional stochastic systems. Future work will involve two research articles: one based on Sections 5–7, and another based on the advanced results of Section 8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWhite Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)French-language works237,207