O “Novo” Ensino Médio em análise: mapeando as produções acadêmicas entre 2016 e 2025 sob a ótica dos sentidos de inovação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo apresenta uma análise do mapeamento de pesquisas acerca do Novo Ensino Médio (NEM), com ênfase nos discursos que sustentam a ideia de inovação curricular. A pesquisa mapeou a produção acadêmica publicada entre 2016 e 2025, considerando os impactos da Lei nº 13.415/2017, da Lei nº 14.945/2024 e do Projeto de Lei nº 5.230/2023. A análise baseia-se na perspectiva da Análise de Conteúdo de Bardin e em aportes teóricos de Ball, Brown, Foucault, Laval e Dardot, visando compreender como a racionalidade neoliberal opera nas reformas educacionais. Os resultados evidenciam a emergência de discursos hegemônicos que associam a inovação à empregabilidade, ao controle docente e à redefinição do conhecimento escolar, em um campo de disputas marcado por contradições e racionalidades de mercado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".