MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7163985870 · doi:10.82465/153

Multi-proxy paleoenvironmental reconstruction of Deep Lake, Saskatchewan

2025· other· en· W7163985870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yevgeniy Kistanov

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAridHoloceneDeposition (geology)NutrientPaleoclimatologyDiatomSalinitySedimentClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A paleoenvironmental reconstruction performed on a lacustrine archive from Deep Lake (DL) located 70 km east of Regina, Saskatchewan, in the Canadian Western Prairie, provides insight into the lake’s past hydrological conditions, water level, nutrients and salinity during mid and late Holocene until modern day. The reconstruction utilizing 14C dating, lithological descriptions, granulometry, diatom analyses , and geochemical XRF analysis, was performed on a 195 cm sediment core (6698 cal yr BP) from the ungauged, shallow (<3 m), and small (3.52 km²) DL reservoir. The results revealed seven distinct zones in the lake's sediment record: 1) From 6698 to 6383 cal yr BP, the lake experienced above average allogenic inputs, low water salinity conditions, and elevated nutrient levels before a 2017 ± 314 year hiatus. 2) Between 4366 and 4067 cal yr BP, there was a decline in allogenic inputs and increase in salinity, indicating arid climate conditions. 3) From 4006 to 3445 cal yr BP, the lake experienced an increase of autogenic deposition, fluctuating water salinity, and fluctuating nutrient levels under arid conditions. 4) From 3391 to 2801 cal yr BP, there was an increase allogenic inputs, decline in salinity, and increase in nutrient levels, indicating wetter climate conditions before a 1018 ± 271 year hiatus. 5) From 1783 to 1068 cal yr BP, there was an increase in autogenic deposition and no diatom deposition or preservation, indicating extremely arid climate conditions. 6) From 923 to 393 cal yr BP, the lake began to transition to modern day conditions with elevated allogenic inputs and elevated salinity. 7) From 256 cal yr BP to present, the lake entered present day conditions with subsaline conditions and elevated nutrient levels. The study of past hydrological and limnological conditions of DL, driven by natural forcings, has provided valuable context for understanding the lake’s modern conditions and its drainage basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→