MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7164099399

Evaluation of an environmental friendly concept of outdoor wintering-pens for suckler cows in Québec using animal based indicators

2015· book-chapter· de· W7164099399 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katrin Heike Sporkmann, Heiko Georg, Stéphane Godbout, Patrick Brassard, Fréderic Pelletier, Michel Côté, Eberhard Hartung

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenAgrar · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental policyAnimal productionContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Im Winter werden die meisten Mutterkühe in Kanada auf begrenzten Weideflächen ohne Stall gehalten. Mit tierbasierten Indikatoren wurde die Wirkung eines neuen umweltfreundlichen Konzepts zur Winterweidehaltung auf die Anpassungsfähigkeit von Mutterkühen und Färsen unter kontinentalen Winterklimabedingungen untersucht. Über zwei Winterperioden wurden jeweils zwei Tiergruppen auf einer begrenzten Weidefläche mit Windschutzwänden und einem überdachten und betonierten Fress- und Tränkebereich gehalten. Die individuelle Wasseraufnahme, das Liegeverhalten mittels ALT-Pedometer sowie die Konzentration an Cortisolmetaboliten im Kot wurden unter zum Teil extremen Klimabedingungen bis -40 °C erfasst. Anhand der Ergebnisse der Indikatoren konnte belegt werden, dass die Mutterkühe ethologisch durch eine Veränderung des Liegeverhaltens, aber nicht physiologisch mit einer Änderung in der Konzentration an Kotcortisolmetaboliten und des notwendigen Wasserbedarfs auf die zunehmende Kälte reagierten.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenAgrarSame topicEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockFrench-language works237,207