MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7164125511 · doi:10.19080/asm.2025.11.555815

The Power Logics of Youth: A Case Study of Canadian Arab Youth

2025· article· W7164125511 on OpenAlexaffabout
Melissa Finn, Bessma Momani

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Social Sciences & Management studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Education and Societal Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)PoliticsSoft powerGovernment (linguistics)Big data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power logics are those principles underlying the pursuit of political and social influence. Many youth are politically purposeful and driven by the search for empowerment, and the desire to create impact and advance political and social gains through their activism. Since youth represent the new generation building movements, it is very important that social science research investigate the principles spurring their action. In this paper, we examine a specific youth demographic, Canadian Arab youth, and investigate the reasons, conditions, and principles of their involvement, and how big the gap is in better understanding them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Social Sciences & Management studiesSame topicYouth Education and Societal DynamicsFrench-language works237,207