MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7164303363 · doi:10.5284/1143178

St Johns Green Primary School, St Johns Green, Colchester Archaeological Building Recording Report

2024· article· en· W7164303363 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Baister

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrickPeriod (music)Foundation (evidence)Late 19th centuryLate period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This scheme of building recording pertains to a historic wall at St Johns Green Primary School, St Johns Green, Colchester. The aim of this programme of recording is to provide a long-term sustainable record of the historic wall prior to any repair work being undertaken. The wall was photogrammetrically rectified and this was marked-up on site during the survey. Detailed photographs were taken of key architectural features. This survey, documentary and cartographic sources were all assessed to determine to the historic background of the wall and its origins. The recording concluded that the surveyed wall contains five phases of construction, ranging from the medieval period to the late 19th century. The wall is supported on a medieval foundation and had been extensively refaced in the post-medieval period with worked stone reclaimed from St John's Abbey to the south-east, as well as reused Roman material. In the early 19th century a brick entranceway was created through the wall, which was subsequently infilled in the late 19th century at a similar time to the construction of the school. A retaining brick wall was also added to the top of the wall at this point to support the raised ground-level on the southern side.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1120.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207