MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TCN-Enhanced Ensemble Framework for Short-Term Olericulture Price Forecasting

2005· article· W7164399804 on OpenAlexaff
Yadagiri Amit, Madanapu Chandu, Rohit Raj, Devender Nayak N

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Probabilistic forecastingTime seriesEconomic forecastingConsensus forecast

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate short-term price forecasting is critical for mitigating income volatility faced by smallholder farmers in Indian agricultural markets. This paper presents a TCN-enhanced stacked ensemble framework for forecasting olericulture crop prices using multi-source mandi data from 2019-2024. The proposed model integrates temporal convolutional networks with machine learning and statistical forecasters, while incorporating uncertainty quantification through conformal prediction. Experiments across multiple commodities and markets demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently outperforms strong baseline models, achieving 15-20% lower forecasting error in terms of MAPE. The resulting uncertainty intervals exhibit reliable empirical coverage under both stable and volatile market conditions. These results indicate that the framework can support more informed price-aware decision-making in real agricultural settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStock Market Forecasting MethodsFrench-language works237,207