MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7164488863 · doi:10.14286/wwns4q

UCSCNOAAOT22

2022· dataset· en· W7164488863 on OpenAlexaff
Ocean Tracking Network Data Centre

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsOcean Tracking Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinook windPacific oceanOncorhynchusScope (computer science)Aquatic animalTelemetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the OBIS extraction of the Pacific Aquatic Telemetry Hub (PATH) and UC Santa Cruz/NOAA Fisheries Santa Cruz (UCSCNOAA) UCSCNOAAOT22, consisting of the release tagging metadata, i.e. the location and date when the tagged animal was released, and summarized detection events of tagged individuals. If readers are interested in the source dataset they may also inquire with the project PIs as listed here or on the Ocean Tracking Network (OTN) portal for this project(https://members.oceantrack.org/project?ccode=PATH.UCSCNOAAOT22). Abstract:The scope of this research encompasses developing a better understanding of how exposure to different water temperatures affects the survival of adult Chinook Salmon migrating to spawning grounds in the Central Valley of California. How thermal exposure affects the probability of mortality for salmon migrating to spawning grounds, the location and timing of exposure risk, and how additional environmental conditions influence the susceptibility of salmon being negatively impacted by thermal stress are important unanswered questions that will benefit fisheries management. We intend to acoustic tag subadult and adult fall-run Chinook salmon in the ocean in 2022 and 2023 with temperature emitting acoustic tags and track both their upstream migration success, and thermal exposure profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.137

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→