Audio-visual emotion recognition based on a deep convolutional neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emotion recognition has several applications in various fields, including human-computer interactions. In recent years, various methods have been proposed to recognize emotion using facial or speech information. While the fusion of these two has been paid less attention in emotion recognition. In this paper, first of all, the use of only face or speech information in emotion recognition is examined. For emotion recognition through speech, a pre-trained network called YAMNet is used to extract features. After passing through a convolutional neural network (CNN), the extracted features are then fed into a bi-LSTM with an attention mechanism to perform the recognition. For emotion recognition through facial information, a deep CNN-based model has been proposed. Finally, after reviewing these two approaches, an emotion detection framework based on the fusion of these two models is proposed. The Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS), containing videos taken from 24 actors (12 men and 12 women) with 8 categories has been used to evaluate the proposed model. The results of the implementation show that the combination of the face and speech information improves the performance of the emotion recognizer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.153 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".