MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7164524053 · doi:10.5683/sp3/hbmpvc

UBC Botanical Garden Nature Vancouver, Long-term Monthly Bird Monitoring Records (2017-2026)

2025· dataset· W7164524053 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bev Ramey, Tara Moreau, Adriana López‐Villalobos

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNature Conservancy of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBotanical gardenHabitatCitizen scienceTaxonBiodiversity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains long-term monthly monitoring birding records at the UBC Botanical Garden from 2017 to 2026. Observations are specified to garden area. Surveys coordinated by Bev Ramey (Nature Vancouver) and Tara Moreau (UBC Botanical Gardens), data curation and archiving by Adriana Lopez Villalobos, Grace Gooding, and Mina Lander (UBC Botanical Garden). The dataset contains 10476 rows and 17 columns and was standardized and collated from monthly spreadsheets into one comprehensive dataset. A secondary dataset containing additional notes regarding surveys is also included. This dataset supports ecological research and habitat monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→