Incarcerated:Contemporary Photography from the Victorian Prison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is what the future used to look like. What is now HMP Lincoln opened at the end of the most significant period of prison construction in British history – with 90 prisons opened or significantly expanded between 1842 and 1877. Here, writes Dominique Moran in her introductory essay to Incarcerated, “was the Victorian faith in ‘progress’, rendered in bricks and mortar and applied to the challenge of remaking those who had set themselves against law and society”. Less than 50 years later, in their 1922 Report of the Prison System Enquiry Committee, Stephen Hobhouse and Fenner Brockway argued that, despite the Victorian prison estate’s relative newness, ‘the only reform to which [their] buildings can be usefully subjected is dynamite’. And yet today prisons such as HMP Lincoln and HMP Liverpool seem as permanent as ever. 32 remain in use, collectively holding around a quarter of the UK’s prison population. Andy Aitchison has been making photographs inside the UK’s prisons for over 20 years. His interest stems from 2004, when he was asked by the Big Issue to photograph inside HMP Wandsworth – another Victorian prison – and, as he later told Time Out: “As soon as I got in, the environment fascinated me. The architecture was incredible and the prisoners were just normal people. I went on to one of the wings and there was the usual shouting, but when I got to the radio room it was like a bit of a sanctuary. Once the guys stepped in there, it was a work environment and they became almost different people. I enjoyed it so much that after the shoot, I got in touch to ask if I could go back to make more pictures. I went 10 or 15 times over a 6 month period. I started meeting guys the same age as me, who had a kid like me – they were in the same situation in life as me, but they were in prison and I wasn’t.” Since that assignment Andy has now photographed in nearly 50 prisons, often making repeat visits as he works on long term projects. His work has been used extensively by charities, has been published both nationally and internationally, and he regularly contributes to Inside Time – the UK’s leading prison newspaper. He has to work under strict conditions: his equipment is searched on entry and exit, consent forms must be signed by any prisoner he photographs, and certain objects – keys,locks, fence numbers – must never be pictured. Faces of the prisoners are not shown – in order to publish a photograph of a serving prisoner, explicit permission from the Ministry of Justice is required. The images in Incarcerated form a truly unique portrait of the UK’s Victorian prisons, and those who live and work in them. This work forms part of a research project, ‘The Persistence of the Victorian Prison’, which considers how the fabric and function of Victorian prisons have changed over time, and what it has felt like to live and work in Victorian prisons in the past and the present. The research project is led by the University of Birmingham’s Professor Dominique Moran, Professor Matt Houlbrook, Professor Yvonne Jewkes of the University of Bath, and Professor Jennifer Turner, of Trier University, whose writings are included alongside Andy’s photographs in this edition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".