MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7164821954 · doi:10.4224/40004057

Building reference year climate datasets for 564 reference locations in Canada

2022· dataset· en· W7164821954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNRC Digital Repository · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverheating (electricity)Climate changeExtreme weatherClimate modelExtreme heatReference data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change in the future will continue to bring about unprecedented climate and climate extremes, and buildings and infrastructure will be exposed to them. To ensure that new and existing buildings deliver satisfactory performance over their design lives, their performance under current and future projected climates needs to be assessed by undertaking building simulations. Reference years are one year (or a few years) prepared from the climate time series to capture aspects of interest from the long-term climate datasets. This database provides access to the following building simulation reference year files for 564 locations in Canada. 1. Typical Meteorological Year data for building energy applications are prepared using Sandia method (Hall et al. 1978; NREL 2008) by concatenating twelve typical meteorological months selected based on Finkelstein‐Schafer (FS) statistics. 2. Temperature reference years: Typical Downscaled Year, Extreme Cold Year, and Extreme Warm Year data are prepared following Nik (2016; 2017) by concatenating twelve typical, extreme cold, and extreme warm months respectively to capture the variability within the ensemble of climate model simulations. 3. Moisture Reference year data are prepared for hygrothermal applications. The median ranked year in terms of MI is selected as the conditioning year and the 10% level year is selected as the extreme year for hygrothermal applications. 4. Overheating reference year data are prepared to support the evaluation of overheating risk in buildings. The method used is described in Laouadi et al. (2020). In this approach, reference years are first generated for each simulation run and each global warming level by identifying extreme years with a return period greater than 15.5 years, using maximum-value statistical distribution functions. Three reference years are generated to represent three types of heat waves: long, intense, and severe. This analysis is repeated for all 15 simulation runs. The final reference years are then selected from the 15 runs based on the maximum values of duration, intensity, and severity. The data are provided for a historical time-period: 1991-2021 and seven future time-periods coinciding with 0.5ºC, 1ºC, 1.5ºC, 2ºC, 2.5ºC, 3ºC, 3.5ºC of global warming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNRC Digital RepositoryFrench-language works237,207