Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores if psychopathic personality traits are associated with conspiracy ideation in response to unusual events. Specifically, participants will complete a Qualtrics survey where they will encounter four hypothetical news events. They will be prompted to share how they explain each event in written responses. Trained research assistants will rate how much these explanations conform to characteristics of conspiracies. For example, how complex and distrustful these narratives are. We expect that participants high in psychopathic personality traits will create narrative explanations for unusual events that are high in these characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.045 | 0.024 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.092 | 0.138 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".