MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165028081 · doi:10.7202/1126080ar

Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter et Rach Cosker-Rowland (dir.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement, New York : Routledge, 2024, 548 pages

2025· article· fr· W7165028081 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Etienne Marcoux

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical Ethics and Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Cover (algebra)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter et Rach Cosker-Rowland (dir.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Disagreement, New York : Routledge, 2024, 548 pages. Un article de la revue Philosophiques (L’Incertitude de la connaissance) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.013
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophiquesSame topicPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryFrench-language works237,207