MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165033110 · doi:10.21199/wb36.4.3

RESULTS OF A PILOT STUDY MONITORING NORTHERN SAW-WHET OWL MIGRATION IN CENTRAL ALBERTA, CANADA

2005· article· W7165033110 on OpenAlexafffundabout
CHUCK PRIESTLEY, L Priestley

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Birds · 2005
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsBirds Canada
FundersTD Friends of the Environment FoundationAlberta Ecotrust FoundationAlberta Conservation Association
KeywordsNettingNatural (archaeology)Fish <Actinopterygii>Life history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We initiated monitoring of Northern Saw-whet Owl (Aegolius acadicus) migration by mist-netting at Beaverhill Lake Natural Area, Alberta, Canada, with a part-time effort in 1997, 2000, and 2001. On the basis of positive results in those years we expanded the study to nightly netting following a standardized protocol in fall 2002 and 2003. Those years yielded 145 and 151 owls captured, respectively. First-year owls represented 68.7% of captures, and females represented 73.8% of captures (two-year mean). Migration began on 18 August, peaked on 3 October, and ended 11 November. Ninety-five percent of the owls were captured between 9 September and 4 November. There were three recaptures within a year and no recaptures in subsequent years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern BirdsSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207