A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CITRUS-LIKE SCENT OF THE CRESTED AUKLET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tangerine-like odor produced by breeding Crested Auklets (Aethia cristatella) of both sexes has attracted considerable attention recently as researchers attempt to determine its function. Chicks and one-year-old immatures do not produce the odor. Even though the odor has long been known to the Yu’pik people of St. Lawrence Island, naturalists and ornithologists visiting seabird colonies on the Aleutian Islands and in the Bering Sea from the mid-1700s through first half of the 20th century did not mention the odor. I trace the steps of two early ornithologists, Charles H. Townsend and Ira N. Gabrielson, whose numerous visits to auklet colonies in the late 1800s and 1940s, respectively, provided opportunities to smell the scent. The odor was eventually described on the basis of specimens smelled during preparation and on the basis of encounters with the auklets at sea. The closely related Whiskered Auklet (A. pygmaea) also produces an odor, but its function requires study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".