MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165197229 · doi:10.4000/16f8j

Le complexe de l’étoile : fantasme et identité chez Patrick Modiano et Philip Roth

2002· book-chapter· fr· W7165197229 on OpenAlexaff
David Gascoigne

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Jewish Fiction Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Sainte-Anne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeTheme (computing)Subject (documents)White (mutation)Exposition (narrative)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour marquer le dialogue anglo-français avec Alain Goulet dont j’ai tiré tant de profit, rien de mieux, je crois, que de confronter un texte français et un texte anglophone. C’est là la première raison qui m’a amené à proposer ici quelques notes qui pourraient servir de base à une lecture comparée de La Place de l’Étoile de Patrick Modiano, paru en 1968, et Portnoy et son complexe [Portnoy’s Complaint] de Philip Roth, dont la première édition américaine date de 1969.Ce n’est pas seulement ce...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.016
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Caen eBooksSame topicAmerican Jewish Fiction AnalysisFrench-language works237,207