MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165258392

Recursos naturales estratégicos: los hidrocarburos y el agua

2006· article· es· W7165258392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMiCISAN · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMexican Socioeconomic and Environmental Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural resourceContext (archaeology)PopulationWork (physics)Metropolitan area
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presentación; Los recursos estadunidenses de gas natural y las nuevas tecnologías para la exploración y el desarrollo; ¿Un segundo auge? El futuro de las arenas bituminosas de Alberta en la producción petrolera de América del Norte; Las reservas de hidrocarburos en México y en el mundo; Evaluación de los recursos petroleros y las reservas recuperables totales en la plataforma marina continental de las aguas estadunidenses del Golfo de México; La integración energética en América del Norte. Una perspectiva canadiense; ¿Abundancia o escasez de recursos petroleros? Una perspectiva geopolítica; La estrategia oficial para privatizar la industria petrolera mexicana y Pemex; El agua como tema de seguridad nacional para Estados Unidos en la frontera con México; El agua de la frontera. Soberanía y seguridad en la región binacional de Estados Unidos y México

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it