MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165335789

Nuevos actores en América del Norte: identidades culturales y políticas

2005· article· es· W7165335789 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMiCISAN · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Gender relationsEthnographyImmigrationDemocracy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción; I. Construcción de identidades culturales: inmigrantes; 1. El papel de los inmigrantes o minorías en la producción fílmica y literaria; Los nuevos viajeros; Viejos caminos; De mitos y de mundos. La poesía de mujeres hoy en Canadá; 2. Movimientos indios: una experiencia diversa; Contra todos los pronósticos: triunfos y tribulaciones de los movimientos de derechos indígenas de Canadá; El reto del diálogo intercultural entre los indígenas de Norteamérica; El liderazgo intelectual indígena en México y en la frontera; II. Democracia y espacio del poder: construcción de identidades políticas; 3. Empoderamiento: la minoría latina en Estados Unidos; ¡Viva la causa!: la organización política de la comunidad de origen mexicano: la transformación de un actor político en Estados Unidos; El papel de los activistas laborales chicanos y mexicanos en la elección del 2001 para la alcaldía de los Ángeles; Un grupo nuevo e importante para la configuración política de California: los legisladores federales hispanos; 4. Derechos civiles y sociales en América del Norte; Teoría feminista y acción política: lecciones de los estudios multirraciales sobre mujeres; Los marginados como actores sociales: el caso de la National Coalition for the Homeless; Una generación de leyes de acceso a la información en Quebec y Canadá

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMiCISANSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207