Cædmon's Hymn: A Multimedia Study, Edition and Archive — author's source documents (final Word manuscript files, 2005)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author's editable Microsoft Word source files for the monograph Cædmon's Hymn: A Multimedia Study, Edition and Archive (SEENET A.8; Cambridge: Medieval Academy of America and D. S. Brewer, 2005). They represent the final author state of the text, from the editing session of 2 September 2005, and comprise the Word master document together with the chapters, supplementary notes, critical editions, witness archive, glossary, bibliography, analytic index, and front matter. The set was assembled as the newest surviving version of each component from the author's working folders: the master and installation documents from one working copy, the chapters and apparatus from another, all carrying 2 September 2005 timestamps. Two minor components (a chapter table and the jacket blurb) survive only in earlier versions and are included as found. Word autosave backups (.wbk) are omitted as duplicates. The digital-edition manuscript transcriptions and edition archive (~116 MB of XML and image files) are not included here: they belong to the digital edition rather than the book text and are a separate body of material. This record is a companion to the pre-publication PDF manuscript (10.5281/zenodo.20755066). The published edition is available as a 2018 internet reprint at https://caedmon.seenet.org/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.223 | 0.053 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".