Newport, Belmont House, High Street Archaeological Evaluation and Archive Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to characterise the archaeological potential of the site of a proposed new development on land to the rear of Belmont House, Newport, Essex, the Heritage Network was commissioned by Archers Developments Ltd to undertake an archaeological field evaluation. This work was a requirement of the planning consent granted by the local planning authority. The site is located in the grounds of Belmont House, on the east side of Belmont Hill, towards the northern end of Newport. The site lies within a sensitive archaeological area of Newport focused on the Saxon and medieval town. The current investigation revealed two features of medieval date, These were north-south aligned ditch [110] and [122] that may represent the rear property boundary to a habitation fronting Belmont Hill, and a elongated water filled feature [117] which could be interpreted as the eroded remains of an unlined well. Truncating the medieval ditch was a series of pit cuts [103], [105] and [106] of post-medieval and early modern date that are probably extraction pits similar to those revealed closer to Belmont House in earlier investigations. Another extraction pit [114] was recorded at the south-western end of the trench.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".