Bibliographic record
Abstract
he New Democratic Party's (ndp) emergence as the leading minority in Canada's House of Commons can be considered transcendent in the nation's poli t i cal history.It is the first time a left social democratic group ing has played that role.This is particularly important given that Li beral and Con servative forces had monopolized power since 1867, making it possible for the elites of both to dominate the political stage.This meant that when one of those parties was in office, the other was invariably the discursive counterweight as the leading minority.This translated into alternation in office of Liberals and Conservatives that stretched out over 40 general elections.1 However, that dynamic abruptly came to an end in the May 2011 election when the ndp became the first minority with c anadian i ssu es 37 Blair Gable/REUTERS The New Democratic Party, Canada's Leading Parliamentary Minority Oliver Santín Peña* * Researcher at cisan.103 members, leading the Liberal Party by 69 seats.Since that time, the ndp has assumed the task of serving as a coun terweight to the majority Conservative Party, headed by ex perienced Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who leads his Conservative caucus's 166 mps in Canada's lower house.2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.292 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".