MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165512033

Entretiens #4 : lettres d’un présent précaire = Letters From a Precarious Present

2021· book· fr· W7165512033 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie-Hélène Leblanc, Mirna Boyadjian, David Garneau, Valérie Yobé, Clément de Gaulejac, Marie-Hélène Frenette-Assad, Marc-Alexandre Reinhardt, Sylvette Babin, Eunice Bélidor, Gentiane Bélanger, Simon Brown, Jessica Arseneau, Dalie Giroux, Jessica Ragazzini, Michèle Thériault, Jérémie Roussel, Jakub Zdebik, Jessica Minier, Hannah Levy-Galdino, Louise Déry, Camille Rivard, Sophie Jodoin

Bibliographic record

VenueE-Artexte (Artexte) · 2021
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunismThe RenaissanceThe Symbolic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la foulée de l'annonce du premier ministre François Legault le vendredi 13 mars 2020 à 11 h 30, l'Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO) a fermé ses portes pour une durée indéterminée.La Galerie UQO a fermé l'exposition Établissement de détention de Hull: 232 beds de Sheena Hoszko et a annulé au fil du temps les conférences, les ateliers, les programmes publics et les expositions suivantes.Le 15 avril 2020, la Galerie UQO a lancé le projet des Lettres d'un présent précaire, développé par Mirna Boyadjian.Nous avons invité des personnes impliquées de près ou de loin à la Galerie UQO à participer au projet et les lettres reçues furent partagées chaque semaine sur notre site Web et nos réseaux sociaux au cours du printemps et de l'été 2020.Nous tenons à remercier tou.te.s les participant.e.s pour leur effort de réflexion et de rédaction

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2290.062

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-Artexte (Artexte)Same topicContemporary art, education, critiqueFrench-language works237,207