MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165604674

Greenhouse Gas and Animal Agriculture Conference: proceedings of the 7th GGAA - august 4th to 8th, Iguassu Falls/Brazil.

2019· other· en· W7165604674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueinfoteca-e (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasAgricultureLivestockAnimal agricultureAnimal productionGreenhouseProduction (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Greenhouse Gas and Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA) is the premier international conference summarising the collective state of scientific knowledge on greenhouse gas abatement strategies and production systems adaptation needs for the livestock sector. The gathering features leading scientists and policymakers reviewing the current state of knowledge and presenting significant new developments in policy, measurement, modelling, mitigation and adaptation efforts associated with greenhouse gases from animal agriculture. The Conference takes place every 3 years, moving from continent to continent at each edition. The first conference, GGAA2003, was held in Japan with 200 delegates from 20 countries. Five subsequent GGAA conferences have been convened: GGAA2005, Switzerland; GGAA2007, New Zealand; GGAA2010, Canada, with the biggest in Ireland, GGAA2013, attracting 460 delegates from 41 countries. The GGAA2016 in Australia received more than 300 delegates from 36 countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1130.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueinfoteca-e (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation)French-language works237,207