MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165689043 · doi:10.52357/armax15445

Inventors & Armies: The Difficult Relationship Between Professor Friedrich Hebler and the Swiss Army in the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth Century

2025· article· W7165689043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Wren

Bibliographic record

VenueArmax The Journal of Contemporary Arms · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary History and Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReputationQuarter (Canadian coin)NewspaperRifleJournalism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the long and often quarrelsome relationship between Professor Friedrich Hebler and the Swiss Army in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. Using contemporary journalism and original archival research, the author examines the achievements and reputation of Hebler and how that reputation was built up by stories of varying degrees of accuracy in newspapers across Europe. The author explores how Hebler actively used the specialist press to criticise the Swiss Army and the development of their new rifle system, and how the military reacted when faced by his challenge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArmax The Journal of Contemporary ArmsSame topicMilitary History and StrategyFrench-language works237,207