MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165734472 · doi:10.1299/jsmetsd.2025.a25

Introduction to the aims and activities of the Occupational Safety and Health Education Research Group for Science and Engineering Students

2025· article· en· W7165734472 on OpenAlexaff
Rieko HOJO, Mitsuhiko TANIGUCHI, Shoken SHIMIZU

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the Tecnology and Society Conference · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical Safety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsPublic Safety Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupational safety and healthGroup (periodic table)Occupational health nursingHealth educationEffective safety trainingOccupational medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States and Europe are aiming for long-term growth through job creation and demand stimulation through strengthened environmental and energy measures. In industrial structure and technological development, there is a growing trend to evaluate efforts to address environmental and social issues, as well as governance, in addition to traditional perspectives such as productivity, profitability, and international competitiveness. In such a complex situation, it is important to develop engineers who have the correct knowledge and meet the standards required by society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the Tecnology and Society ConferenceSame topicChemical Safety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207