Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Patrick Geddes's little magazine The Evergreen: A Northern Seasonal (1895–97) advocated for Celtic revivalism in Edinburgh at the fin de siècle . Scholars have often characterized The Evergreen as an organicist manifesto because of how it conceptualized processes of cultural and environmental change through composting metaphors of seasonal rebirth. Although the magazine does display an organicist impulse, this desire for holistic closure is unsettled by incoherencies that do not fit within neat fantasies of cyclicality. This article employs archival-based research, contextual research, and ecocritical theories to identify moments of friction between closure and openness that trouble the magazine's organicist fantasy of Renascence. I argue that this tension is generated by the magazine's complex engagement with decadence, neopaganism, and the Celtic revival—cultural movements often seen as at odds with each other. With close readings attentive to the magazine's sympathies for concurrent countercultural movements, I will demonstrate how The Evergreen 's open ecological values helped contributors to imagine radical routes to sustainable futurity by destabilizing political complacency, unsettling urban alienation, and encouraging multispecies kinship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".