MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165803907 · doi:10.54554/ijeeas.2025.8.02.001

Energy Demand Planning in Boma: Towards Sustainable Electrification

2025· article· W7165803907 on OpenAlexaff
A. Mampuya Nzita, L. Mwanda Mizengi, S. Sibitali Aukawa, B. Ndaye Nkanka, G. Dituba Ngoma, C. N’zau Umba-di-Mbudi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electrical Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEEAS) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrificationRenewable energySustainable energyEnergy planningSustainable developmentEnergy transitionElectricityQuality (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on long-term energy demand planning for the residential sector of Boma, Democratic Republic of Congo, due to frequent power outages. The main objective is to analyze energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and associated social costs using LEAP software. Quantitative and qualitative research methods were applied, including surveys of 757 residential consumers. The results show an increasing reliance on alternative energy sources, leading to significant environmental and economic consequences. General findings highlight the need to improve access to sustainable energy sources and promote electrification. Specific findings indicate that the transition to renewable energy could reduce carbon dioxide emissions while improving household quality of life. Lessons learned emphasize the importance of energy planning to ensure a sustainable future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Electrical Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEEAS)Same topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207