MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165825940

Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six b quarks using pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

2025· other· en· W7165825940 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Francisco Alonso, Jean Yves Beaucamp, María Teresa Dova, Fernando Gabriel Monticelli, Francisco Sili, Hernán Pablo Wahlberg, The ATLAS Collaboration

Bibliographic record

VenueEl Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesCERNTRIUMF
KeywordsHiggs bosonBranching fractionPseudoscalarLarge Hadron ColliderBosonAtlas (anatomy)Scalar (mathematics)Scalar bosonStandard Model (mathematical formulation)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson H into new scalar or pseudoscalar particles that subsequently decay into b-quarks is presented. The search considers ZH production with several decay scenarios for the Higgs boson; first to a pair of identical scalars, H→2a→4b, second to a pair of scalars with different masses (ma₁ < ma₂), either directly, H→a₁a₂→4b, or via a longer decay chain, H→a₁a₂→3a1→6b. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data at √s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb−1. No significant excess above the Standard Model prediction is observed. The search sets upper limits at 95% confidence level on the ratio of the Higgs boson production cross section to the SM prediction times the branching ratio of Higgs bosons decaying into 4b or 6b, between 4% and 25% for σ(ZH)/σSM(ZH)×B(H→2a→4b), between 24% and 38% for σ(ZH)/σSM(ZH)×B(H→a₁a₂→4b), and between 10% and 20% for σ(ZH)/σSM(ZH)×B(H→a₁a₂→3a₁→6b), depending on the masses of the scalar particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEl Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata)French-language works237,207