MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165919777 · doi:10.53437/1drg2b95

Farsi Hame-i DPs and Intensional Transitive Verbs

2022· article· W7165919777 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Alonso‐Ovalle, Esmail Moghiseh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransitive relationAdverbialInterpretation (philosophy)ModalExpression (computer science)Adjunct

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverbial modification suggests that some, but not all, Intensional Transitive Verbs (ITVs) take clausal complements [11]. Evidence from Farsi, coming from the interpretation of hame-i DPs, confirms the split. Hame-i DPs are existential quantifiers that acquire universal force via exhaustification [6]. We provide new data showing that hame-i DPs can have free choice interpretations, but only under certain conditions. The pattern is new. Free choice interpretations of hame-i DPs are found with ITVs, but only those that do not seem to take clausal complements. ITVs that seem to take clausal complements pattern with modal auxiliaries, which don't allow for free choice readings. If free choice readings are derived when a modal expression intervenes between an exhaustivity operator, EXH, and the DP, this means that not all modal expressions can intervene between EXH and hame-i DPs. To account for the restricted availability of free choice interpretations, we propose that EXH and hame-i DPs need to be within the same minimal clause.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationFrench-language works237,207