MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165958703 · doi:10.5284/1143761

Building Survey at John A W Briggs Furniture, 19 Bridgefield, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire, AB39 2HY

2025· article· en· W7165958703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alison Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasementBlock (permutation group theory)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Level 1 standing building survey was carried out on 28 July 2025. A building pre-dating 1850 was constructed in sandstone on the junction of Bridgefield and Carron Water; the side walls are in red brick. At least 5 extensions were added over the late 19th-20th century when the building was in use as a joinery workshop - extensions in stone, shuttered concrete, concrete block and wood. The interior is wood lined and floors except the basement which has concrete floors. There are people in Stonehaven who worked at the business and some of them added information for this report and there is evidence of the joiners all over the wooden elements of the building where they have written their names. The property is interesting as it has only had four owners James Murray from 1832, Robert Thomson (joinery) from 1900, John A W Briggs, carpet sellers and now the current owner. Part of the shop was used as the office for the Stonehaven Provost in the 1890s (The Press and Journal 14.9.2022).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207