MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W71686876

Interactions Of Fast Ions With Supported Graphene: Quantum Hydrodynamic Model

2010· article· en· W71686876 on OpenAlexaff
I. Radović, V. Borka Jovanović, Z. L. Mišković

Bibliographic record

VenueVinaR (Institute of Nuclear Sciences "Vinča") · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneIonElectronPlasmonQuantumSubstrate (aquarium)Valence electronMaterials scienceValence (chemistry)Condensed matter physicsPhysicsNanotechnologyQuantum mechanicsOptoelectronics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a quantum hydrodynamic (QHD) model to describe the high-frequency plasmon excitations of the carbon valence electrons responding to fast ions which move parallel to a single sheet of graphene supported by an insulating substrate. We calculate the stopping and the image forces on ions. Numerical results are obtained showing the effects of variation in size of the gap between graphene and the SiO2 substrate, as well as the effects of a finite frictional coefficient, on these quantities

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVinaR (Institute of Nuclear Sciences "Vinča")Same topicDust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207