HORIZONTAL BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL INTEROPERABILITY USING MODEL TRANSFORMATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The D-mannose specific lectin from sainfoin was prepared by affinity chromatography on Sephadex G-75, and its circular dichroism (CD), metal content, antigenic character, and N-terminal amino acid sequence were compared with those of four lectins from Vicieae plants and concanavalin A. The sainfoin lectin was only slightly more closely related to these other D-mannose specific lectins, than to lectins of leguminous plants in general. The CD and antigenic experiments also confirmed the close relationship of the four Vicieae lectins. The N-terminal sequence showed sainfoin has two isolectins, differing in sequence at residue four. The sequence was homologous to N-terminal sequences of several other lectins; hence, despite some structural and specificity similarities, the sainfoin lectin does not show the circular permutation of sequence unique to concanavalin A. This region also contained the sole cysteine residue, at position 33. The carbohydrate-binding properties of the sainfoin lectin were studied by gradient affinity chromatography. Its apparent Ka for methyl alpha-D-glucoside was approximately 10(3) M-1, close to the Ka of the pea lectin. However, in the relative binding behaviour of methyl alpha-D-mannoside, maltose, and methyl alpha-D-glucoside, it resembled concanavalin A more than the pea lectin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it