MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W72032353

Indigenous perspectives and experience: Maori and the criminal justice system

2005· book-chapter· en· W72032353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Juan Tauri

Bibliographic record

VenueQUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCriminologyCriminal justiceImprisonmentPolitical scienceColonialismEconomic JusticeVictimisationRestorative justiceSociologyLawPoison controlSuicide preventionMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the key features of colonial jurisdictions such as New Zealand, Canada and Australia, is the high levels of offending, victimisation and imprisonment amongst their indigenous populations. Another feature that all these jurisdictions share is the consensus amongst Indigenous peoples that the imposed criminal justice system is responsible in part, for the negative indigenous statistics, and inappropriate for dealing with indigenous offending. Using the Maori situation as a case study, this chapter looks at how colonial jurisdictions have responded to the ‘overrepresentation problem’ and indigenous criticisms of the criminal justice system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)Same topicWildlife Conservation and Criminology AnalysesFrench-language works237,207