Criminal Defense Advocacy in Russia Under the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal Article Criminal Defense Advocacy in Russia Under the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code Get access Pamela A. Jordan Pamela A. Jordan 1Assistant Professor of History, University of Saskatchewan, Canada. The author's research for this article was funded by a President's Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Grant and the University of Regina. The author would like to thank William Burnham, Eugene Huskey, Nikolai Kipnis, Gordon Smith, Peter H. Solomon, Jr., and participants of the April 2004 History Research Workshop at the University of Saskatchewan for their comments on an earlier version of this article. However, she takes full responsibility for the opinions and potential errors in the work Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 53, Issue 1, Winter 2005, Pages 157–188, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/53.1.157 Published: 01 January 2005
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it