MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of a human pancreatic α‐amylase inhibitor, montbretin A, on the chronic treatment of type 2 diabetes

2010· article· en· W72420223 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Violet G. Yuen, Gary D. Brayer, Stephen G. Withers, Raymond J. Andersen, John E. Coleman, John H. McNeill

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Drug Research and DevelopmentUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAcarboseInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineDiabetes mellitusTriglycerideHypertriglyceridemiaCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Montbretin A, a purified glycosylated acyl flavonol, was isolated from extracts of the plant Crocosmia crocosmiflora. Montbretin A has been shown to be a specific inhibitor of human pancreatic α‐amylase (HPA). The objective of this study was to determine if chronic administration of montbretin A and acarbose, an inhibitor of α‐glucosidases and HPA, could prevent and/or delay the onset of diabetes in the Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rat. Montbretin A (7.5 mg/kg/day) and acarbose (10 mg/kg/day) were administered to ZDF and lean littermate controls for 60 days. Plasma was analyzed for glucose, insulin, triglyceride, cholesterol, alanine transaminase (ALT) and 8‐isoprostane. Both montbretin A and acarbose attenuated the increase in plasma glucose levels in the ZDF rat. There was no effect of montbretin A or acarbose on lipid parameters. All ZDF animals had elevated ALT levels; however, ALT levels were significantly higher in the acarbose treated group, which may indicate an exacerbation of liver damage. This study indicates that montbretin A is as effective as acarbose in lowering plasma glucose levels; further studies are ongoing to assess the side effect profile of montbretin A. Project was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and supported by the Centre of Drug Research and Development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesFrench-language works237,207