Gateways and Canada's Ports Policy: Issues And Impediments.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gateways and trade corridors have occupied North American thinking in recent years as businesses struggle to compete in the global trading environment. In the past year, the issue has come to the fore on the east coast of Canada, and there has been much discussion about the promise of an Atlantic Gateway. This paper begins by examining the issue of gateways and trade corridors in general, and the Atlantic Gateway in particular. It draws on three recently published studies examining the Atlantic Gateway as a potential infrastructure investment, and seeks to explore the issues and impediments surrounding the development of the gateway. It then moves to explore port governance in Canada and, more specifically, the issues of port governance that support or impede the development of gateways, and in particular the Atlantic Gateway. Port governance issues are not the only ones influencing gateway development on the east coast, and the paper will conclude by examining other regulatory barriers and administrative governance structures that influence gateway and corridor effectiveness in global supply chains serving North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it