MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W744671196 · doi:10.59139/ws.2012.03.2

Problematyka badań jakości zatrudnienia

2012· article· en· W744671196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agnieszka Zgierska

Bibliographic record

VenueWiadomości Statystyczne The Polish Statistician · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabour Market and Migration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionQuality (philosophy)Political scienceStatistical analysisRegional scienceOfficial statisticsEuropean commissionPublic administrationLibrary scienceSociologyStatisticsLawBusinessComputer scienceEuropean unionMathematicsInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents international activities on statistical indicators describing the quality of employment in as comprehensive way as possible. These issues are dealt with the seminar organized by the UN Economic Commission for Europe, Eurostat, ILO and Statistics Canada. The seminar was held in Geneva last year. The collaboration of institutions, participation in seminar initiated in 2000, resulted in proposed seven research themes and a number of indicators. The seminar expert groups have exchanged their experiences in trying to synthesise the described problems in the statistical indicators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiadomości Statystyczne The Polish StatisticianSame topicLabour Market and MigrationFrench-language works237,207