MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W74508643

What's to Fear: Calling homophobia into question

2006· article· en· W74508643 on OpenAlex
Didi Khayatt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityHeteronormativityDeviance (statistics)NormativeHomosexualitySociologyResistance (ecology)Gender studiesHumanitiesMainstreamEthnologyPolitical scienceArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. This paper examines the interplay between gender and sexuality. In particular, it looks at some reasons why mainstream society cannot bear homosexuality, or any expression of resistance to heteronormativity. The paper also considers in what makes schools particularly hostile to teaching or tolerating deviance from set notions of essentialized and normative sexuality. CE QU’IL FAUT CRAINDRE : LA REMISE EN QUESTION DE L’HOMOPHOBIE RESUME. L’auteure examine les liens entre le sexe (genre) et la sexualite. Notamment, elle explique pourquoi la societe en general ne peut supporter l’homosexualite ni toute expression de resistance a l’heteronormativite. L’article analyse aussi ce qui rend les ecoles particulierement hostiles a l’enseignement et a la tolerance de toute deviation des notions etablies de sexualite normative et essentialisee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it