MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W745876618 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2002-0025

NON-UNDERCUTTING CONDITIONS OF ROLLER GEAR CAMS

2003· article· en· W745876618 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jie-Shing Lo, Ching-Haun Tseng, Chung‐Biau Tsay

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRADIUSPoint (geometry)Pressure angleMechanical engineeringRadius of curvatureEngineeringPlanarLimitingCurvatureComputer scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The undercutting conditions in a planar cam can be predicted by comparing the radius of the curvatures of the pitch curves with the radius of the cutter. For the complexity of the spatial cam generation, the principle radius of the curvatures and the directions of the generated cam surface are different from point to point along the pitch curve so that predicting the undercutting condition becomes very difficult. The undercutting conditions on the roller gear cams use the concept of limiting conjugate motion generation. In this study, the feasible design region without undercutting is presented. The investigation results are very useful to the designer and the manufacturing engineer for understanding the undercutting characteristics of the roller gear cam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207