MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W746534903

Party of One: Stephen Harper and Canada’s Radical Makeover

2015· article· fr· W746534903 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Joseph O’Connell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionPoliticsIdeologyPower (physics)SociologyLawPolitical scienceLiteratureArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Party of One: Stephen Harper and Canada's Radical MakeoverMichael Harris, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Viking, 2014.In the Party of One: Stephen Harper and Canada's Radical Makeover (2014), Michael Harris provides enough evidence to charge Stephen Harper and many of his colleagues with crimes against democracy. In a painstaking account of the key changes and scandals of his administration, Harris' forensic 485 page study (19 Chapters) of Harper and the steady reshaping of our nation should be read by every Canadian before the next federal election. Devoid of political theory or scholarly prose, this remains a readable journalistic account of the ways in which federal politics is run today under the Harper regime. Using media reports, documents and numerous interviews, Harris is on a mission to document and reveal how the ideologically driven world of economic fundamentalism operates. If this was a piece of fiction, the depiction of single-minded ruthlessness here might be titillating, however, Harris exposes the Federal Conservative Brand and how its policies shred nation building and devastate vulnerable populations. These are not unknown or hidden events and policies, many have been major debates or scandals doggedly covered by investigative journalists. Yet, somehow amidst the mere scope and constancy of these policy shifts, we lose the thread that binds these changes together in ways that help us see the big picture. This book goes a long way in bringing the big picture into focus.In the chapters that follow, Harris provides a brief account of Harper's rise to power and examines how his political calculations have resulted in the robocall scandal, the in and out scandal, the F-35 fighter jet fiasco, the attempted closure of the experimental Lakes Area (ELA), the war on science, the environment and the Chalk River crisis, foreign policy failures, a disregard for First Nations governance and treaty rights, the Senate scandal and the retraction and restriction of parliamentary debates and protocols. This book makes clear that his early attachment to big oil, republican style politics and a disdain for welfare states organizes his approach to policy and governance. Harper is concerned with growing the economy, at all costs, and targets those who stand in his way as dangerous, criminal or unpatriotic. Irrespective of human rights or preserving the environment, growing the economy, however, applies only to a tiny sector of corporate or political elites, many of whom (such as Nigel Wright, John Baird) rotate through government and corporate positions to great personal advantage. Harper's drive to line the pockets of the wealthiest is matched by a disdain for the public sector and public servants who have been dismissed from prominent positions. Parroting the Bush maxim, whoever is not on your side is your enemy, has been applied to scientists, workers, Aboriginal leaders and peoples, veterans, civil servants, diplomats, political opponents and the judiciary. While this book is about Harper and his party, what does his reign tell us about liberal democracies and the colonial histories that legitimate them?Beyond Harper's personality, and his drive for personal power and party supremacy, his tactics have proceeded successfully by fear mongering and capitalizing on colonial divide and conquer tactics and discourses that produce insiders and outsiders to the nation. For many Canadians, this is an alien world run by a closed network of power brokers that are accountable to no one. An elite that throws top lawyers, strategists, and pollsters at any crisis to grind down processes of accountability until no one is listening or the facts are so obfuscated the veracity of all statements are undermined. Hetero-patriarchal bureaucratic corporate power relies on the use of code words, (or as Ahmed (2004) calls them: sticky words) used to legitimize their authority; words that often result in the complete opposite of their meaning. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207