MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W747435919

Beyond Crowd Psychology: The Power of Agoral Gatherings

2014· article· en· W747435919 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Howard A. Doughty

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinnovation journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Representations and Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleEntertainmentDissentPower (physics)Law enforcementSilenceLawSociologyPlot (graphics)Media studiesCriminologyPolitical sciencePoliticsAestheticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adam Biela (Ed.) Beyond Crowd Psychology: The Power of Gatherings Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang, 2013Whenever more than three loose and disorderly were spotted coming together in a group, the authorities suspected that a plot might soon be afoot. Whenever a gang of ten or twenty was detected, the elites feared an impending riot. And, should dozens or hundreds gather in one without proper supervision or an appointed task, it was expected that an incipient rebellion would soon ensue. For this reason, control was and remains one of the major responsibilities of the state and its law enforcement agencies.Crowds (more commonly known as mobs) have been feared since ancient times. In order to defuse potential expressions of popular distress, the poet Juvenal famously tells us that the Romans provided the people, with panem et circensus. We seem to prefer pub grub and beer to accompany professional sports on a large flat-screen, but the motive and the effects are the same. Gluttony and spectacle combine to leave the otherwise insurrectionist rabble flabby and docile.Longstanding patrician fear of plebian uprisings has also been incorporated into contemporary social science where, as academic adjuncts to the ruling classes, social researchers have poked and prodded the subaltern masses in search of the triggers of action. Armed with this intelligence, the rulers have been able to discover the most effective means to silence dissent. Apart from the production of mass entertainment as a distraction (television and the twitterverse) and the occasional use of brute force (successful when used sparingly, but prone to backfire if applied too frequently), one of the best ways to deal with the disaffected is to marginalize them by psychologizing the discussion of them and their grievances.By psychologizing, I mean redefining political protest and economic discord as manifestations of mental disease or disorder. The old Soviet Union did this with the desired results in the post-Stalin era when dissidents were routinely carted off to mental health facilities for treatment. In the West, however, the tradition of rendering opposition impotent by consigning it to a category of abnormal social has a much longer background. Adam Biela and his associates aim to correct that.The subtitle of Biela's collection may raise an eyebrow or glaze over an eye. For many of us, the term Agoral Gathering may seem odd and unfamiliar. As a noun, agoral refers to a powerful laxative but, I am pleased to say, we're dealing here with the adjective the central public space in the city-states of ancient Greece.The direct translation is meeting place or assembly. It was where politics and public business was conducted. It was in the Athenian agora, we may presume, that Socrates was sentenced to death. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that those people who were disgusted by democracy and who feared the mob in more recent times traced back and justified their antipathy to gatherings of ordinary citizens by referencing the taking of hemlock by that antique philosopher, sometime soldier and certified stone mason. From Martin Luther's early sixteenth-century cry for the brutal repression of peasant revolts (Pelikan and Oswald, ??: 50-51) to the disgust felt by gentler twentieth-century citizens at the popularity of lynchings in the American South, we have commonly understood to be irrational, violent and extremely difficult to control.Our disdain for the dangers posed by crowd psychology and collective behaviour results in an important ambiguity and a dilemma for inhabitants of modern liberal democracies. On the one hand, at least since Western societies came reluctantly to embrace formal democratic procedures and to accept the legitimacy of elected representative governments, it has been hard to maintain overt opposition to popular sovereignty and the principle that governments should be elected by and be responsible to the people. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinnovation journalSame topicSocial Representations and IdentityFrench-language works237,207