Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les tenants de la thèse de la sécularisation ont vu les formes traditionnelles de religion décliner devant la modernisation. D'autres observateurs, notamment Rodney STARK et William BAINBRIDGE, ont perçu la sécularisation comme un facteur stimulant l'innovation au moyen de laquelle de vieilles religions sont graduellement remplacées par de nouvelles. Les résultats d'enquêtes entre 1970 et 1980 suggèrent que pour les catholiques du Québec, ces deux explications présentent de sérieuses limites. Devant le changement social, l'Église catholique qui est bien établie, a fait preuve d'une élasticité considérable. En outre, les gens dont les parents sont catholiques ont manifesté peu d'intérêt à se tourner vers de nouvelles religions. Ce qui a changé avec le temps, c'est la propension des catholiques à choisir non pas de nouveaux groupes, mais de "nouveaux produits", optant de plus en plus pour des fragments religieux plutôt que pour un engagement qui englobe tous les aspects de la vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".