Bibliographic record
Abstract
This course surveys modem dramatic literature with the aims of sharpening appreciation for the art form and using great plays as an opportunity to engage cultural, existential, and personal issues.In particular, this semester, we will be examining plays set in high society.The selection of primary texts will be wide-ranging to represent a number of different dramatic forms and perspectives, from the canonical "greats" of the period (Wilde, Shaw, Chekhov etc.) to playwrights not ordinarily grouped with them (J.M Barrie, Susan Glaspell, and Noel Coward) as well as avant-garde artists.Because of time constrictions, the course will only cover the period to around 1950.After exploring two plays written by the enormously influential Henrik Ibsen, we will proceed to mainly early modem English and American plays and how they negotiate issues of gender, class, race, Modernism, and desire.The course approaches these plays as both literary *and* theatrical texts, discussing not only their political, historical, and modem implications but also their potential for acting, directorial, and technical choices.Toward that end, we will also be analyzing videotaped productions as well as live performances whenever possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".