MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W74802733

Health Care Lessons from Switzerland

2013· article· en· W74802733 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nadeem Esmail

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Services Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsFraser Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careMedicineHealthcare systemHRHISHealth policyBusinessEnvironmental healthEconomic growthEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is part of a series that examines the way health services are funded and delivered in other nations. The nations profiled all aim to achieve the noble goal of Canada's health care system: access to high quality care regardless of ability to pay. How they organize to achieve that goal differs markedly from the Canadian approach. So do their performances and results.The focus of this paper in the series is Switzerland. The Swiss health care system has previously been identified as a system that provides some of the best outcomes when compared with other developed nations that maintain universal approaches to health care insurance. The Swiss health care system has also been identified as highly responsive and one in which waiting times are not considered to be a problem. A careful examination of the Swiss health care system will provide insights and information that will be useful in the Canadian debate over the future of Medicare.Health system performance — Canada compared to Switzerland:Looking at factors such as the ability of the health care system to provide healthy longevity, low levels of mortality from disease, and effective treatment for both chronic and terminal illnesses, it seems the Swiss health care system broadly performs at a level similar, if not superior, to that in Canada. Specifically, the Canadian health care system outperforms Switzerland's in five of 13 measures examined: one of three measures of in-hospital mortality, two of three measures of primary care performance, and two of six measures of patient safety. Conversely, the Swiss health care system outperforms Canada's in eight measures: infant mortality, two of three measures of in-hospital mortality, one of three measures of primary care performance, and four of six measures of patient safety.Lessons for Canada:The combination of superior access to health care and potentially superior outcomes from the health care process with fewer resources suggests there is much Canadians can learn from the Swiss model. It must be recognized that emulating the Swiss approach to health care would require substantial reform of the Canadian system including, most significantly, a shift from a tax-funded government insurance scheme to a system of independent competitive insurers within a statutory enrollment framework. While that may be a large undertaking, the evidence suggests there may be significant benefits to doing so.The Swiss health care system departs from the Canadian model in the following important ways:•Cost sharing for all forms of medical services•Private provision of acute care hospital and surgical clinic services•Activity-based funding for hospital care•Permissibility of privately funded parallel health care•A system of statutory independent insurers providing universal services to their insured populations on a largely premium-funded basis (commonly known as a social insurance system), with individual choice of insurers and some personalization of insurance coverage

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicHealth Services Management and PolicyFrench-language works237,207