MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Essential role of albumin in CD14-independent activation of MD-2/TLR4 by endotoxin (135.20)

2009· article· en· W7480551 on OpenAlexaff
Greg Angel Esparza, Athmane Teghanemt, Desheng Zhang, Theresa L. Gioannini, Jerrold Weiss

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsImmunovaccine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRIFTLR4AlbuminChemistryCD14ReceptorMonomerDivalentBiochemistryCell biologyMolecular biologyToll-like receptorBiologyInnate immune systemOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Host response to endotoxin (E) depends on the ordered interactions of LBP, CD14, MD-2 and Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 4. CD14 is required for efficient transfer of E monomers to MD-2 (/TLR4) and for induction of TRIF-dependent signaling by activated TLR4. At high E concentrations, MD-2/TLR4-dependent cell activation by E is possible without CD14 through an unknown mechanism. We now show that incubation of purified E aggregates (Mr = 20 million) in PBS with = 0.1% albumin in the absence of the divalent cations Ca2+ and Mg2+, yields monomeric E:albumin complexes (Mr ~70,000). E monomers transfer from E:albumin to MD-2 and to MD-2/TLR4 directly and induce MD-2/TLR4-dependent, CD14-independent cell activation. Our findings suggest for the first time a mechanistic basis for CD14-independent cell activation by E. E:CD14 and E:albumin complexes should provide valuable reagents for future studies of MyD88-dependent (CD14-independent) and TRIF-dependent (CD14-dependent) TLR4 signaling by E. Work supported by NIH/NIAID #AI59372.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicImmune Response and Inflammation→French-language works237,207→