Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the methods of microinjection, microiontophoresis, electrolytic destruction and electric stimulation, the present work was undertaken to investigate whether the lateroventral periolivary nucleus (LVPO) might play a role in the central mechanism of chemoreception on respiration. Experiments were performed on 38 chloralose-urethane anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. The results were as follows: (1) Bilateral microinjection of acidified mock CSF into the LVPO region, evoked an enhancement in respiratory activities. (2) Microiontophoretic application of H+ caused mainly excitatory effects on the spontaneously discharging units in LVPO region, and some of the excitatory units were also responsible to microinjection of acidified mock CSF to the ventrolateral medullary surface. (3) After the electrolytic destruction of bilateral LVPO region in carotid body denervated rats, respiratory response to inhaled CO2 was attenuated significantly. (4) Electric stimulation of LVPO region caused an increase in discharging frequency of some units in the NTS and NRA regions. The above results indicate that LVPO plays a significant role in the central mechanism of chemoreception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".